The vibes are off for some major players in the crypto treasury space. Index giant MSCI just greenlit a new rule change that classifies certain firms as "non-operating companies," and it could lead to the removal of Strategy, Metaplanet, and Upexi from its global indexes.
The New Screening Process
Under the updated methodology, MSCI is putting companies through a gauntlet of five financial ratio tests. If a company fails four out of the five, it’s lowkey at risk of being axed. It’s not an instant "L" for everyone, though—existing companies generally have to fail these checks over two consecutive annual reporting periods before they get the boot.
Beyond those three, other firms like Sharplink, Inc, Ton Strategy Company, Solana Company, and DeFi Development Corp. are landing on a watchlist for potential exclusion.
The Market Impact
Real talk: being dropped from an MSCI index is a big deal. It forces funds that track these indexes to dump the affected shares, which can put heavy pressure on stock prices. While earlier estimates from JPMorgan suggested a massive $2.8 billion sell-off, that figure was based on a different proposal.
Strategy previously acknowledged the potential for disruption but noted that funds tracking the MSCI Global Investable Market Indexes hold about 13 million of its shares. They say that represents roughly 3.1% of their basic shares outstanding, which they claim is less than one day’s trading volume.
The Timeline
Don't panic just yet, but keep your eyes on the calendar. MSCI is set to drop the final list of companies getting the boot on Nov. 11. If your bags are in any of these, just remember that index changes don't change the underlying tech—but they definitely shift market demand. The changes officially take effect on Nov. 30, 2026.
Why it matters
This is a classic case of traditional finance gatekeeping meeting the crypto-native world. When index providers change the rules, they essentially decide which assets are "legit" enough for the average retail investor's portfolio. It’s a reminder that centralized gatekeepers still hold a lot of power over market flows, even for companies that are going hard on-chain.






