A complex portrait

Mike Tyson is 60 now, a grandfather who has outlived the poverty of his youth, the peers who bullied him, and even fellow icons like Tupac. He’s currently back in the spotlight with a new four-part Netflix docuseries, but the reality of his life today is a strange mix: he’s mixing it up with Jake Paul in the ring, hitting up manosphere podcasts, and even popping into a White House press briefing to support a friend during a tough midterm cycle.

In the doc, Tyson admits, “Some reason, something allowed me to exist.” It’s giving main character energy, but the project behind it is a classic vanity effort that feels a bit hollow. While we see him engaging in therapy and even a hallucinogenic 5-MeO-DMT trip, it feels like a carefully curated performance. As Tyson himself says, “This camera, to me, is a narcotic.” He is well aware he’s producing his own redemption arc.

The missing pieces

For anyone looking for a deep dive into the controversies that defined him, the doc has some major blind spots. Key figures like Robin Givens and Desiree Washington are noticeably absent. Washington, who was 18 when she accused Tyson of rape, is treated by the fighter as just another “opponent” he beat. He even boasts about his financial success compared to hers, claiming he feels “invincible.”

Director Floyd Russ also sits down with Donald Trump, who promoted several of Tyson’s fights. The interview feels mostly like a missed opportunity, with Trump mostly pivoting the conversation to his own grievances. The assault allegations that once defined the headlines aren't even brought up. It’s lowkey frustrating—the doc captures his candor about growing up poor and the trauma of losing his trainer Cus D’Amato, but it never forces him to actually own his worst actions.

Why it matters

Tyson has spent decades on a charm offensive, moving from the “baddest man on the planet” to a campy pop-culture figure. This docuseries proves that while he’s willing to talk about his pain, he’s still not ready to be fully accountable. For the audience, it’s a reminder that even when a documentary claims to pull back the curtain, it’s often just showing us what the subject wants us to see.