The internet’s biggest horror community is currently having a main character moment, and the vibes in the film industry are shifting. If you haven’t spent your late nights scrolling through the SCP Foundation Wiki, you’re missing out on some elite collaborative creepypasta lore.

Recently, A24 announced they were working on an SCP movie, but the project flopped before it even started because they didn't bother to chat with the actual Wiki staff. Plus, they were being sketchy about the Creative Commons licensing that SCP content legally requires. Lowkey, the community was furious.

Neon reads the room

Enter Neon. They saw the drama, realized A24 took a major L, and decided to do the bare minimum—which, in this case, is actually being a decent partner. Neon announced they’re also making an SCP film, but they’ve already secured the bag by working directly with the SCP Wiki team. Most importantly, they’ve officially pledged to release the film under the required Creative Commons ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license.

The fine print

Before you get too hyped, let’s be real about what this actually is. It’s not an “official” project. The Wiki staff aren't writing the script, they aren't getting paid, and they aren't stamping it with an endorsement.

Neon hasn't dropped many details yet, but they’re aiming for a 2027 theatrical release. That’s a super quick turnaround for a film, which suggests we’re probably looking at a smaller, low-budget production. Honestly, that makes sense—it’s notoriously hard to monetize a film when you're playing by ShareAlike rules.

Why it matters

The SCP Foundation isn't just a collection of spooky stories; it's a massive, open-source experiment in digital storytelling. When a big studio tries to cash in on community-built IP without respecting the license, it’s giving major disrespect. Neon’s move proves that if you actually communicate with fans and follow the rules of the project, the community is way more likely to be chill with you. The admins even put out a statement shouting out Neon for their “excellent communication.” Say less.